By Robert Crane
If you have any thoughts of seeing the movie "Hostel", you just might want to read this first. Or if you saw the movie and find yourself asking "what the hell was that", you might want to read this too.
I really do not go to the movies often, maybe three times a year, usually for big screen productions like Lord of the Rings or any Star Wars episode or the new King Kong, once in a while for an off-beat drama or comedy. That’s not to say I don’t watch flicks—I do, just in the privacy of my own place. The problem is that audiences annoy me with the talking and the chewing and the crunching and the snorting already. I have a control issue about my viewing environment, okay?
Anyway, I can count on one hand, assuming none of my digits have been hacked off, the number of so called horror movies I have seen in a theater in my life. The last one—Alien, 1979. The last one I purposely rented to see was The Blair Witch Project, 1999. Of course, I have tuned in on the usual stuff around Halloween to get my fill of Freddie, Michael and the gang. It’s like anything else, when I want to laugh, I watch comedy; when I want to think, I watch a documentary. I know what I want to experience, when I want to experience it. And once in a blue moon, I want to be scared.
Such was the case this past weekend. So I went to see “Hostel”. That seemed to be the movie to see for horror.
A couple of things. First, I’m not good with the gore stuff; “Reanimator” comes to mind as a great example of gore gone nuts. Second, I’m not big on the shock scene; you know—bump in the night shots. But that is exactly what I look for when I want to be frightened. They work. They scare the living crap out of me. So I have a few uneasy nights afterwards, maybe a diminished appetite for a few hours. Eventually, I’m able to dismiss the movie’s reality and I’m good to go for another two or three years.
Not so with “Hostel”.
I should have known something was up when the ticket guy at the box office warned me about the content and offered a money-back refund if I left before the end. But no, I figured it was all part of the hype, sort of like when theaters handed out vomit bags for “Mark of the Devil” back in 1970.
I was wrong, really wrong! I should have heeded his words.
My rating system for movies is quite simple: two eyes wide opened (great; i.e., never blinked), two eyes opened (good; i.e., stayed awake all the way through), one eye opened (fair; i.e., moments of drowsiness) and finally two eyes closed (poor; i.e., fell asleep).
“Hostel” got two-eyes-shut-so-tight-I-had-to-have-them-opened-with-a-tire-iron. My lids involuntarily closed soon after a long steel drill bit gouged its way into the bare thigh of a screaming pleading young male torture prop. It was only five seconds into what would be about a five minute long—felt like a lifetime—assault of pure, unadulterated, uncompromising, unapologetic gore. I almost didn’t make it; my stomach swirled. But eventually the darkness and screaming ceased. There was a momentary break to race the plot along and propel the hero into the inevitable final twenty-five minutes of salacious slaughter and desperate depravity. My armpits were dripping like an uncapped fire hydrant.
When the disfiguring rampage began anew, I slunk my body as far down as it could go without touching the sticky theater floor, squeezed my eye lids tight, and held on as I rode the run amok rollercoaster of bloody body tissue. I soon learned that you can’t get low enough in stadium seating.
I won’t go into details of the finale; well actually I can't, because quite honestly I didn’t see much. But I don’t need to go into it. I'll just skip to my opinion: this movie is not horror. It is wrong!
It uses a “true events” premise based loosely on an undocumented practice in Thailand in which poor souls allow themselves to be murdered by paying customers in order to collect insurance money for the families. In this case, it is a poor, remote, lawless Slovakian town whose only commerce is the business of luring young healthy humans to a dank rundown remote warehouse where they are bought as sacrificial lambs for wealthy troubled men who pay handsomely for the opportunity to torture and kill. Live Americans fetch $25,000 a piece, Europeans $15,000, and all others $5,000 for the locals who bring them in; the youth Hostel being a big player in the scheme. Everyone in town is in on it; after all, there seems to be an endless revenue stream coming from a lot of messed up CEO’s—men bored with prostitutes and Vegas. It gives a whole new definition to a cottage industry.
Anyway, the reason I contend it is not horror is because it didn’t scare me. It beat me over the head with lifeless limbs and Dolby dread. If I want horror, I want to watch a ten year girl munching on her dad’s detached bloody arm in “living dead” delight. Or I want to see a slimy alien pop out unexpectedly from an unsuspecting space traveler's stomach. Now that is horror. I can deal with that. At the end of the day, I can say “it’s all pretend”.
But “Hostel” delights in the graphic detail of man’s worst inhumanity to man. It cashes in on the reality of snuff films. It profits from the truths of Dr. Josef Mengele. It fills male teenage heads, the primary (and possibly only) target audience, with the most unimaginable of actual human potential. It finds and scrapes the bottom of what I thought was a bottomless pit of DNA gone bad. And it ends with a hopeless sense that nothing has been righted; that it will be torture business as usual.
And the movie is lucrative and that is wrong! The only thing more wrong is its rating. I am astounded that the movie did not receive an NC-17 rating. Astounded! The MPAA was either asleep at the switch or under the lobby thumb of Abramoff.
As far as Tarantino’s endorsement is concerned, what is he thinking about? I just don’t know. I mean he has a right to do whatever he wants, as long as it isn’t harmful. But somehow this movie seems harmful. It's not about scaring. It's about indulging in the worst of the worst.
And by no means am I off the hook on this either. I paid to see it. I was wrong too!
Look, I'm a First Amendment lackey. Lion's Gate, the production company, has every right to create and promote what they want. But that doesn't mean that what they choose to do is exempt from being judged right or wrong, and boy are they wrong.
It will be a long time before I see a horror movie in a theater again. Maybe never. I think I’ll just dust off “Plan Nine from Outer Space” the next time I have an urge for a scare.
Pathetically, that’s more my style.
This article was written by humorist Robert Crane. If you like what you read and want a bit more, please visit his popular website at: http://www.cranelegs.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Robert_Crane http://EzineArticles.com/?Hostel-Hostility---A-Movie-Review&id=125984
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Ralph Crenshaw
There are many who say that the movie is never as good as the book, sadly, as this The Da Vinci Code movie review will show, they are probably right. The movie had all the makings to become an enormous success. Tom Hanks as the leading man, an Oscar winning director, and based on an incredibly popular best selling book. The creators of this film must have taken that for granted as they forgot to make this a good movie.
The story is disjointed and none of the mystery and puzzle solving the book was famous for transferred onto the big screen. The screenplay is weighed down by pointless exposition, never giving the audience any character development. Details that where small in the book were made huge in the movie, and very important sections of the book were either fast forwarded through or left out all together.
Critical plot points are “included” via flashback scenes that I have no idea how someone who has never read the books is possibly supposed to understand. The character development of the albino monk was on of the most fascinating storylines in the book. Besides one or two unexplained flashbacks this was completely ignored in the film.
When a new clue or riddle presents itself there is no explanation to how the character solves it, it is almost like they are struck by divine intervention when figuring it out. The book was a RIDDLE MYSTERY. The movie doesn’t even come close to having that feel. I want to feel the suspense and anxiety the characters go through when facing a seemingly unsolvable mystery. Instead we had people standing around until the cartoon light bulb appeared over their head, so the story could continue.
The biggest testament to how poorly the script was written was the awkwardness of Tom Hank’s character. I have never seen Hanks give a poor performance, but even he seem baffled at the directions this movie took. It takes a great deal of work to make Tom Hanks look bad, but “The Da Vinci Code” tried very hard. Instead of being able to focus on the story, I was left feeling sorry for Hanks for having to put up with such a piece of garbage.
While the movie was pretty to watch, it lacked any substance or intrigue. The people behind the scenes must have become incredibly lazy to make such a bad translation. With the book being such a huge success there was obviously room for a huge letdown, but this film crashed straight through even that floor. If you have never read the book there is a chance you will be entertained, but if you have, expect a huge disappointment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more great articles like this The Da Vinci Code movie review visit my Movie and TV Blog
where I review tons of movies and shows. I also show you how to get all the latest movies instantly.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ralph_Crenshaw
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Da-Vinci-Code-Movie-Review&id=416940
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Todd Murphy
BOTTOM LINE: A rich, heart-warming film that takes the unusual premise of a man growing younger and using it to provide a number of life lessons about making the most of what you have been given.
THE GOOD: Director David Fincher has made some very rich and complex films in his career, many exploring the darker sides of humanity. With "Curious Case", he still retains his unique style but manages to fuse it with a more heart-warming feel without losing touch with reality which he could easily have done given the quirky premise of a man born old who grows younger. Many great themes of life, love and death are covered, particularly the ideas of destiny, fate and choice. Benjamin Button (Brad Pitt) is abandoned at birth by his father who thinks he is a monster. He is taken in by a loving black woman who raises him in her old person's home who are there to live out their few remaining years. As Benjamin grows, he gains a unique perspective on life; he learns quickly about the end of life and what it means to not waste any moments you have been given. Coupled with his unusual condition which makes him an outcast, Benjamin develops in to a gentle, non-judgmental character you cannot help but love. This is no more demonstrated in his relationship with Daisy (Cate Blanchett) whom he meets early in his life and leads to a rocky friendship to an eventual loving relationship. Fate continues to bring them together, and when their respective ages become closer, they develop a relationship which is full of highs, but is doomed to end early as their age gap begins to widen again.
One brilliantly constructed scene involves a car accident involving Daisy. Benjamin re-constructs the incident in his mind, pointing out a number of very minor events, and if even one of these minor events had not occurred, she would not have been on the street at the time she was involved in the accident. In many ways, this scene envelopes the finer themes of fate that run throughout this film and how life can take things away from you in a single moment, a lesson which works for all of us in that we should never take our lives for granted. Both Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett are perfect in their respective roles. Pitt delivers a very understated performance that is instantly loveable given Benjamin's gentle persona. Blanchett creates a complicated girl who has a very turbulent early life but becomes content and grounded when she becomes more intimately involved with Benjamin. The images are absolutely glorious. David Fincher is renowned for creating vivid, and carefully constructed shots and he does not disappoint in this movie, with each picture being a movie in itself.
THE BAD: The film feels a little long-winded. At over two and a half hours, the film does have a slow pace which could have been improved with some editing. The film is not boring, but there were some moments where I found myself shifting in my seat, more because of the running time than the story. The scenes involving Daisy as a dying woman in the hospital with her daughter reading Benjamin's diary do not always fit naturally in to the Benjamin's life story, and the moment where her daughter realises that Benjamin is her real father does not seem fair to the character when it happens. In many ways, "Curious Case" has a lot in common with "Forrest Gump", but unlike the latter film, "Curious Case" does not have the same energy or pace to make it stand out as a masterpiece. Having made these points however, David Fincher has done a fabulous job with this film and it is worth seeing at the cinema.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the original review, follow this link: http://www.allaboutmovies.net/filmreviewthecuriouscaseofbenjaminbutton.htm
Todd Murphy is a staff reviewer at the film/DVD review web site,
http://www.allaboutmovies.net - for all the latest reviews on the newest releases.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Todd_Murphy
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Megan P.
Movie Mama Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
Recommended For: Elementary school age and above
Starring: Helen Mirren, Brendan Fraser, Paul Bettany, Jim Broadbent, Andy Serkis
Directed By: Iain Softley
Running Time: 1 hr. 43 min.
MPAA Rating: PG for fantasy adventure action, some scary moments and brief language.
Genre: Adventure/Family/Fantasy
Mo Folchart (Brendan Fraser) was born with a special power: anything he reads aloud comes to life. He did not know of his gift until he read the book Inkheart to his young daughter, Meggie (Eliza Hope Bennett). Several characters from the book appeared before him: the evil villain Capricorn (Andy Serkis), a few of his thugs, and a fire-juggler named Dustfinger (Paul Bettany). And as if the characters leaping off the page and threatening Mo with his life weren't bad enough, his wife Resa (Sienna Guillory) was tragically transported into the book. When the book is destroyed, Mo spends his entire life traveling with Meggie all over the world in search for another copy of Inkheart so he may bring his wife back to the real world.
Inkheart, in essence, is a fantasy tale about a fantasy tale. The idea of reading stories to life is an intriguing one. With all the wonderful books and characters in literary history, Inkheart had the potential to be an intimidatingly great, masterfully woven film. But the author and director took the easy route, handing the audience a mediocre story with an messy ending of underutilized characters.
While Inkheart is an acceptable family flick, true movie lovers are going to feel cheated and confused. For example, Meggie has an English accent, even though we're led to believe that she has never settled down anywhere, and her father has an American accent. Maybe I'm a bit too picky about accents, but when a director has the ability to create a world for us to step into, the most simple elements should click. Eliza Hope Bennett is a terrific Meggie, and her accent is lovely, but it was distractingly out of place.
Helen Mirren plays Meggie's rude Aunt Elinor who lives a life of solitude, escaping into novels instead of setting foot in the real world. Her character is an interesting one, especially when she gives up her solitude to help Mo and Meggie, but Helen Mirren's performance is nothing above community stage acting. I was thoroughly irritated with her by the end. As for Brendan Fraser, he brings nothing new to the movie screen since his most recent film, Journey to the Center of the Earth.
PROS
Even though Inkheart's author creates Dustfinger as a cowardly and selfish character, he learns that he can choose to be different, that our actions and choices change who we are, and that we are not preconceived notions of ourselves.
Dustfinger redeems himself in the end, becoming a selfless person. However, this is only depicted by him committing one solitary selfless act. In my opinion, this isn't enough to convince me that he has changed, but one selfless act is better than none.
Mo is consistently protecting Meggie, much to her chagrin. But he's a wonderful father figure, risking his life for hers several times. He is also committed to restoring his family, searching for years to find his lost wife and reunite with her.
CONS
Dustfinger's pet ferret fetches keys from an old hag's wrinkly cleavage. I thought this was distasteful and uncalled for. The villains are comical and not truly scary, however they do wield knives and one of them cuts Mo's arm in a flashback. The shadow creature at the end may be too much for little ones. There is a violent tornado scene where men are swept up into the cyclone, as well as very mild language.
OVERALL
Inkheart is a mildly entertaining family flick, but nothing more.
=================================================================
Megan is the staff family movie reviewer for http://www.pluggedinparents.com . For more parenting articles on health and safety, nutrition, baby, money and tech, family life, pets, and movie reviews, visit pluggedinparents.com today!
==================================================================
By Alex Jacobs
'How to put movies on your iPhone'. Every iPhone owner wants to know how to be able to watch movies on their iPhone.
The Apple iPhone is more than just a glorified cell phone. You can listen to music, but it isn't the only feature that separates the iPhone from other gadgets. With the iPhone you can surf the Internet, check email and watch movies. That's right, full-length movies right in the palm of your hand.
There are a few ways to get movies onto your iPhone. The first way is finding them on the Internet. It's easy to do a search, but be careful on which sites you use. There are illegal sites out there and you should avoid these. You can get into trouble for downloading movies that you don't have permission to do so. Besides potential fines that you can't afford, you can also download harmful viruses that will mess up your computer and iPhone. In the end, it isn't worth it.
Look for legal sites that offer unlimited downloads. There are some free ones out there, but review these sites before you begin downloading files. Some of them might seem too good to be true. Look at the pay sites that offer a one-time fee to access their library. By paying just once you gain access to loads of files for the lifetime of the membership. On some sites you aren't just limited to movies. You can also get music, games and programs.
But, what about the movies you already have? You have a shelf full of DVDs that you would love to watch at the push of a button. This is a piece of cake.
First you need a program that rips DVDs into a readable format for your iPhone. This process is called ripping. You can do a search for a DVD ripper on the Internet and thousands of results will come back. Read about the different programs and try out a trial version if there is one available. This way you can figure out if you like the program and if it is easy to use. Make sure you rip the DVD into an mp4 file because this is the file your iPhone reads.
Once you have either ripped your DVD or downloaded a movie, put the movie into iTunes. This is how you are going to transfer movies into your iPhone. Connect your iPhone to the computer and sync up the two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're ready to become a portable movie library. Your iPhone doesn't just need to be a cell phone or a replacement for your iPod. It can become you personal movie theater as well. Start getting those movies into your iPhone. [http://www.topproductreview.net/iphones/iphonedownloadreview.html]Watching movies on your iPhone is one of the best things that you can do with your iphone. [http://www.topproductreview.net/iphones/iphonedownloadreview.html]Get the full review on the best sites on iPhone Movies available on the internet
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE MOVIE DOWNLOADS AND REVIEWS
By Jamie Hanson
Films are one of the most required and desired source of amusement and excitement in ones life. Our lives have changed tremendously with industrial advancements and growth. We can live a more comfortable life as compared to the life in the past.
The technology has not only changed our existence but also largely changed the world of films which has a great influence in our day to day lives. We just can't imagine about living without films as movies are the most wished amusement zone for all the generations. Whether you are a child or a teenager or an older person, there is a large range of movies for everybody. Now we see how the improved` technologies have altered movies forever.
Therefore, the year 2008 the audience was greatly impressed by James Bond-Daniel Craig in Quantum of Solace who used an improved piece of gadget that was a phone with a camera and GPS!, Now that was a genuine tech piece and this style and some unusual gadgets along with Hollywood extraordinary effects gurus will surely continue in 2009 as well and will naturally pull a huge crowd of spectators towards the 2009 films.
In Iron Man, Tony Stark prepares a suit of shield that was highly powered internally; this was made to flee his rebel captors after which he carefully lands into his billion dollar home laboratory where he sharpens his armor ouyfit to a greatly powerful machine after which he becomes an Iron Man. The team of researchers and scientists are working day and night to create robotic suits that will really increase the wearer's power. This is also called Strength-Enhancing Exoskeleton Armor.
Now what more can popularize 2009 movies? Levitation, a kind of mysterious or mystic phenomenon has largely effected 2009 films. Technical Levitation like Yoda where a paranormal power is applied to pick up Luke Skywalker's X-Wing from the swamp and some invention like flying saucers and other aircrafts that stay in the air have a great positive impact on the 2009 movies. The research scientists are still working to cope with newest levitation of Power. Magnetism has created a levitation effect on certain objects and recently scientists have discovered additional techniques to enhance levitation technology. All these developments have proved to be a gift for 2009 Movies.
Invisibility is the most appealing experience used in 2009 movies; you can see it in Harry Porter's films which produce more of thrill than knowledge. This invisibility technology has produced startling effects that can be viewed in Porter's shroud. The invisibility researchers are operating upon to produce reality effects in invisibility skill and it is their renewed dedication which will be proved with the release of Harry Porter and the Half-Blood Prince. The X-Ray Vision Effect seen in Superman is an excellent model of technological X-ray Vision in these advanced movies. In 1996, Arnold Schwarzenegger bike Eraser, this film displayed a greatly developed weapon called rail-gun that could see through solid objects was all because of extraordinary impact created by X-ray Vision technology. The scientists have come out with a new technology called terahertz imagery that can see through materials and plastic clothes.
The presentation of Thermal imaging spectacles worn by police and military has set a strong liking for 2009 Movies. Time Travel experience was a great hit which was viewed in Back To Future style De Lorean time is impracticable but Einstein's researches have exposed a way to time travel. Then with the time dilation incident it was possible to travel to future, where if one brother of the twins traveled to space with the speed of light, he would be younger than his twin brother who existed on the planet and if his space tour went on for a year, the twin would show that he had been for ten years. Well all this and a lot more yet to come and stun the world with astonishing technology that will alter the perception of 2009 Movies.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/art-and-entertainment-articles/2009-movies-a-look-at-how-technologies-have-changed-movies-forever-794320.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Author:
To know more about 2009 Movies and to see how new technologies have taken Movies to greater heights look at new upcoming movies Get a detailed view on how technology has brought a great change in 2009 Movies at www.cinemarv.com
*reposted with full permission from Articlesbase.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Paul Smith
Wanna Download Hannah Montana The Movie in less than 15 minutes? That's right … today's technology makes downloading and watching the latest theatrical releases easy as ordering a pizza.
More people than ever are looking for safe ways to download full version movies from the Internet. The easiest way to do this is to use the right file sharing software. It is possible to get this file sharing software for free, but for the not so experienced Internet user this could be a problem. Which file sharing software to use? How do you configure it? How exactly do you use the software to download Hannah Montana The Movie? Is it free from adware, spyware, viruses?
Whew! … no wonder most people just give up and end up buying those $39 DVDs.
Most people are aware of the dangers of downloading movies for free. You never really know what you have downloaded bundled with that movie. There are a lot of spy-ware / ad-ware and other nasty programs around, so much so that I advice you to be very careful with downloading movies for free from the internet. The safest method is to get a membership from a reputable movie social sharing site. Then you are virtually assured of downloading only the safest, best quality version of a movie like Hannah Montana The Movie
The best movie social sharing websites have tens of thousands of full length movies that their members can download. Now in Hi-Def too! These films are playable on various devices including iPod, PDA (HandHelds), PC, DVD & DivX players. Members also have access to software to burn these downloaded movies to DVD. This allows you to watch the movies on your big screen tv from the comfort of your cushy couch. All free to members.
Most of these movie social sharing websites work the same way. They provide you with the right file sharing software, without any ad-ware, spy-ware or virus. You use this file sharing soft ware to search the Internet for downloadable movies, downloadable songs, downloadable games etc. Once you find those files you can download them to your P. C. The download sites will also give you full on-line support in case you run into problems.
And no one will ever know your personal information, as you can keep absolute anonymity. All content from these sites are available over encrypted and secure connections. Nobody will even know that you have been downloading.
The cost of a movie social sharing membership is on average between $40 and $50. This can be a yearly fee, but most sites offer a lifelong membership for around $30. You pay once and then you can download all the movies you ever want.
I have tested many of these sites and can point you in the right direction.
If you are ready to download Hannah Montana The Movie safely in perfect quality as well as all the new theater releases then please visit this download movie review website for instuction.
NOTE: This article was reposted in complete adherence to GoArticles.com reposting guidelines.Stories of ghosts and their misdeeds have been around since the beginning of time. Of course, they make the perfect subject for horror movies. Here is a list of some of the scariest ghost movies of all time-tune up your HD TV and turn off the lights as you prepare to be scared.
The Shining
This is an iconic ghost/horror movie. Directed by the great Stanley Kubrick and starring Jack Nicholson, The Shining is a masterpiece of the horror genre. In the movie, a family heads for an isolated Colorado hotel in the middle of winter where Jack Nicholson's character, a writer named Jack Torrance, is to finish a writing project while his wife takes care of the hotel. During their stay, his son Danny, sees visions of the hotel's dark past using a telepathic gift dubbed 'the shining'. Soon, the isolation gets to Jack and he goes mad. A ghost convinces the writer to 'correct' his family, and Jack sets off to kill his wife and child. Things go down hill from there; watch the remastered version of this film classic in HD.
Poltergeist 
That clown, the little medium with the squeaky voice, the glowing TV-poltergeist was one of those horror movies you watched as a kid and were thoroughly terrified by. The movie, in a nutshell, is the story of a family living in California that discover that life isn't so sweet in their suburban home. Who can forget the first time Carol Ann, the young, wide-eyed daughter makes contact with the evil spirits through the TV set, saying 'they're here'. That line never fails to make the hairs stand up on the back of your neck. This is a modern horror classic which you can often catch via satellite TV-just consult your listings.
The Haunting
Directed by Robert Wise, this 1963 is a classic ghost movie. The plot revolves around a group of experts investing a haunted house. Dr. Markway agrees to study Hill House in order to prove the existence of ghosts; he is accompanied by Luke a skeptic who also will inherit the house, Eleanor a psychic, and Theodora, a clairvoyant. It's a simple story that doesn't rely so much on any special effects or creatures to scare you, as much suggestion. There isn't a single goes depicted in the film. The 1999 remake, on the other hand, does rely a great deal on computer graphics and special effects-this version is one to watch on your new flat screen HD TV; however, it doesn't pack quite the punch as the original, according to film purists, classicists and anyone with sense of good taste; still, you could do worse.
The Amityville Horror
This movie was based on a true story. The occurrences that went on at the Amityville house were actually documented. After merely 28 days, the family left the house leaving all of their possessions. They never came back. This is an iconic haunted house movie that will leave your hairs standing on end. The creepy children's chorus score, the disembodied voices yelling harshly , and the bleeding walls will definitely make you reach for a pillow to hug. This one usually plays on satellite TV close to Halloween.
When you get [http://www.directstartv.com/]Direct TV, you can be sure you are getting the best TV on TV. Go with one of the great [http://www.directstartv.com/directv_programming/directv_total_choice.html]Direct TV specials available now. You'll have all the best sports, movies and HD programming at your fingertips!
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_R._Harrison http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Scariest-Ghost-Movies-of-All-Time&id=2174333
